ADI Client Onboarding

Unlocking $257k/yr in lost revenue and making sales faster through a better onboarding flow

About the Project

I collaborated with Web, Credit, and Sales teams to redesign the company's customer onboarding process.

client

ADI Global Distribution is the distribution wing of Resideo, a Fortune-1000 worldwide wholesale distributor of security, networking, and Pro A/V products.

challenge

The process was disorganized and lacked standardization, causing delays, lost sales, and poor first impressions.

skills & methodology

Skills: User research & interviews, data analysis, affinity mapping, journey mapping, layout design, prototyping

Tools & Methodology: Figma, Miro, Perplexity AI, Salesforce CRM

timeline & team

6 months from rough concept to handoff

National Head of Sales

Digital Marketing & E-Commerce Manager

results

  • Onboarding time reduced by 3.9 days from application to account activation
  • Mean time to activation decreased to 2.5 days
  • 73% reduction in SPAM or unqualified applications
  • Sales & Credit teams reported fewer questions and smoother customer experience

THE CHALLENGE

Why are we doing this?

There were several signs that something wasn't working:

Low Completion Rates

Only about 10-30% of applications completed the whole process.

Long Wait Times

Most accounts took over >7 days to activate, with some waiting up to a month.

Unclear Communication

Repeat questions and missed steps indicated that  

Lost Sales

Sales staff were reporting lost sales due to the lengthy wait time.

RESEARCH

Understanding the Problem

The process was chaotic and inefficient, with no standard operating procedure, leading to inconsistent customer experiences.

Research Methods & Challenges

challenge #1

Selection Bias

description

I could only contact clients who had already had accounts.

SOLUTION: INTERVIEWS

I interviewed staff across different departments to understand the usual flow, common snags, and understand where the process failed.

challenge #2

Limited Data

description

The company didn't track form analytics or completion rates, so I needed to estimate that information myself.

solution: qualitative analysis

I examined emails and account metadata to map the process and timeline, despite lacking analytics.

🧑‍🦰

Dou, Jr. Inside Sales Rep

Recently took on account onboarding as a job duty

👱‍♀️

Sarah, Sr. Inside Sales

Fields questions about application status from customers

👨‍🦱

Dave, Branch Manager

Approves applications for account setup

👴

Doug, National Head of Sales

Oversees overall client experience and bringing in new customers

👩‍🦰

Rochelle, Sales Manager

Manages customer escalations and issues within the application process

👩‍🦰

David, Sr. Credit Analyst

Reviews credit applications and granting lines of credit

Piecing Together User Journeys

By combining data and interview feedback, I pieced together the typical journey to gaining an account, including customer, employee, and automated system actions:

Some Key Takeaways:
  • Over 70% of applications don't complete the process past the initial webform
  • This user journey uses no CRM or centralized software; everything is handled off between staff members as email threads.
  • Notice the transfers between roles (staff, customer, and system), especially early on. Each of these transfers causes delays.
  • None of this process is automated, increasing the mental load and opportunities for error.

Problems Unveiled by Journey Mapping

While nailing down the customer journey, it became clear that poor UX on the staff-facing side was a root cause of customer pain points.

For example:

  • One staff member told me that she sometimes confused one application for another and would send an update to the wrong customer
  • Another said he found handling several applications at a time overwhelming, so he procrastinated answering them.

I pried for more details on what bothered them, and then created affinity maps to sort pain points into 4 main themes:

The process is so disorganized and overwhelming. Most of the time, I put it off.

- Junior sales associate

We get so many SPAM applications, and good leads are kept waiting while we figure out who's who.

- Branch manager

There's so many redundant steps. If we got rid of them, it would speed things up a lot.

- Credit analyst

COMMUNICATION
  • Lack of communication (eligiblity, processing time, documentation, etc)
  • Confusingly-worded web copy
ORGANIZATION
  • Data scattered across platforms
  • Poor coordination between parties
COGNITIVE FRICTION
  • Web form UI causing friction
  • Finding & uploading hard copies of documents
PROCESS EFFICIENCY
  • Lack of automation causing a bottleneck
  • No SOPs or resources (eg email macros) increasing the mental load
  • Redundant steps

With research completed, I arrived at a clear problem statement:

‍

problem statement

Onboarding shapes the customer's first impression of ADI.

This essential component of customer acquisition must be redesigned to improve experience for both staff and end users.

design: part i

Designing the User Journey

The user flow was redesigned with input from the Credit, Web and Sales teams. We considered

Strategy Behind the Redesign:

  • Front-loading the user flow.
    Requiring documentation upfront helps deter ineligible applicants and reduces hand-off delays.
  • Cutting the fat:
    Moved optional stages like credit applications to the end, reducing user overwhelm and keeping users engaged during processing.
  • Conditional Logic to Prioritize Users
    Users requesting high-value quotes after completing the flow were prioritized to prevent delays in processing urgent orders.
  • Short Answer Question
    Requiring a "human element" will help sort qualified applications from those filed by bots or AI-generated text.

design: part 2

Designing the Customer-Facing UI

The UI redesign carried a strong rationale as well:

  • "Bite-sized" process:
    Breaking the form down into many smaller steps, to improve engagement and reduce errors
  • Communicate Requirements:
    Use UI elements to set clear expectations and communicate steps

Choosing Layout Options

Organization

Establishing a way for staff to organize, track, and find

Efficiency

Eliminating redundancies and finding opportunities for automation

Strategic friction